Ethnologies

 

CONTESTED GEOGRAPHIES / TERRAINS DISPUTÉS

27-2, 2005

Johanne DEVLIN TREW, Diane TYE
Introduction

Peter LATTA
Contested Space: A Place on the Way to Collaborative Government?

Johanne DEVILIN TREW
The Forgotten Irish? Contested Sites and Narratives of Nation in Newfoundland

Sabina STAN
De la nostalgie à l'abjection: La mémoire du socialisme à l'épreuve de la transformation postsocialiste

Adrian IVAKHIV
Colouring Cape Breton "Celtic": Topographies of Culture and Identity in Cape Breton Island

Jade ALBURO
Boxed In or Out? Balikbayan Boxes as Metaphors for Filipino American (Dis)Location

Francine SAILLANT, Mary RICHARDSON and Marie PAUMIER
L'Humanitaire et les identités: Un regard anthropologique

Ian BRODIE
"The very environment militates against denial": Negotiating Place through Material Culture

Diane TYE
On Their Own: Contemporary Legends of Women Alone in the Urban Landscape

OPEN TOPIC ARTICLE

Kristin HARRIS WALSH
"You just nod and pin and sew and let them do their thing": An Analysis of the Wedding Dress as an Artefact and Signifier

CONTESTED GEOGRAPHIES

Johanne Devlin Trew
Queen's University Belfast
Diane Tye
Memorial University of Newfoundland


To live in St. John's, Newfoundland during 2000 was to inhabit contested terrain. At the time residents of the city were caught up in an intense debate about the impending construction of The Rooms, a much needed heritage facility to house the provincial art gallery, museum and archives. The decision to build The Rooms over the ruins of an eighteenth century fort had split the cultural community into camps: those who felt that the dire need to adequately protect the provinc's art, artefact and manuscript collections outweighed any reservations about site choice, and those who could not get past the irony of destroying archaeological remains in the name of preserving provincial heritage. The controversy became a lightning rod for the discussion of government mishandling of other issues and of earlier injustices. Hard feelings surfaced as pleasant dinner conversations quickly erupted into heated debates when the topic of The Rooms was raised. It was a time to tread carefully and yet amidst intense local media coverage, it seemed almost impossible to do so. Bitter disagreement about The Rooms split apart families and divided heritage supporters who had long worked together on preservation projects. This special issue of
Ethnologies had its genesis in this debate as we reflected on our personal negotiations of a very tricky terrain.

The articles that follow challenge the very concept of geography in explorations of sites as diverse as The Rooms heritage facility: Romanian agricultural policies; a Nova Scotian Celtic festival; Filipino Balikbayan boxes; competing discourses of humanitarianism in Québec; an Ontario hospice room; and contemporary legends of women alone in the urban landscape. They show that, as feminist geographer Linda McDowell has written,

one positive effect... of the anxiety about the meaning of place, and the understandings that globalizing forces reconstruct rather than destroy localities, has been a shift towards a more sophisticated conceptualization of the notion of locality or place itself. The commonsense / geographical notion of a place as a set of coordinates on a map that fix a defined and bounded piece of territory has been challenged. Geographers now argue that places are contested, fluid and uncertain (McDowell 1999: 3-4).


We begin this special issue with two articles that examine facets of the heritage controversy that first sparked our interest. In the opening article, Peter Latta recounts the history of The Rooms debate, drawing attention to processes of public decision making and in particular, questioning the role of public consultation in government decision making around heritage matters. The second article to address The Rooms dispute takes a different tack. Here Johanne Devlin Trew focuses on the controversy to explore constructions of Newfoundland as an Irish place, and shows how this local discourse of space and place is grounded in two competing narratives of the Newfoundland nation: Republican and Confederate.

The focus moves from urban to rural settings with the next two articles. Sabina Stan examines agricultural policy frameworks in Romania and competing visions of socialism. Stan reminds us that one's position determines one's memories and that in remembering we also look forward. Our version of the past informs our present and future and, as Stan argues in the case of Romanian farming collectives, visions of the past are not simply reconstructions but also commentaries on the types of societies in which we wish to live. Adrian Ivakhiv identifies Cape Breton's Celtic Colours International Festival as another site where historical and geographical claims are contested. Here, cultural identities and natural landscapes come together in a construction of both Celticity and ecology. Ivakhiv argues that views of nature and culture intertwine as products of social, economic and ecological practice.

The gaze widens further to the transnational with Jade Alburo's consideration of Filipinos living in the United States. The gifts they bring to relatives and friends in the Philippines, known as Balikbayan boxes, become symbolic of the ties these immigrants have to their families and their homeland. The gifts, as well as souvenirs that the immigrants bring back to their new homes in the United States, reflect their sometimes competing identities as native Filipino and new American. Francine Saillant, Mary Richardson and Marie Paumier continue to explore questions of the global and the local in their discussion of discourses of humanitarianism. The authors present two competing approaches to humanitarian organisation, demonstrating, as McDowell notes above, how globalism can often reconstruct rather than destroy the local.

This special issue of Ethnologies closes with two papers that problematize notions of public and private space. Ian Brodie's autoethnographic reflection explores the decoration of a hospice room in the context of his dying father.s declining health and shifting family relationships. Finally, in turning her attention to contemporary legends that feature lone female protagonists, Diane Tye raises the issue of nonplaces, those spaces of supermodernity, like shopping malls and parking lots, where people increasingly spend their time. She argues that the legends reveal female challenges to the male domination of public space at the same time they expose powerful male defences.

In these varied contested spaces, as Adrian Ivakhiv writes, "cultural identities and natural landscapes intermesh at every possible level, from the local to the global. They do this through the medium of technology, discourses, representations and material practices." The sites of contestation take a variety of forms: festivals, objects, legends, or state policies, but from cultural institution to cultural discourse, the geographies speak loudly of who we are and how we see ourselves. From family to local community to nation state, we constitute ourselves through "the stories we tell ourselves about ourselves," to cite the familiar words of Clifford Geertz (1973). By contesting these geographies, individuals and groups challenge the hegemonic control of dominant, publicly sanctioned narratives that tell us who we are, what constitutes our past, our gender, our ethnicity, our nationality, and significantly, what will be our future. Together these articles raise fundamental questions about what localities count as family, community and home and, through their analyses of spatial contestations and negotiations, the authors explore the nature of belonging. In examining constructions of family, ethnicity, region and gender, they reveal complexities that illustrate how both feelings of belonging and of entitlement alter as geographical boundaries shift. Perhaps above all, the studies in this issue underscore the notion of multiple realities. They argue forcefully that it is not simply one story we tell ourselves about ourselves, but many stories.

Building on the premise that one cultural text may have many meanings (Geertz 1973; Miller 1998), and that an examination of traditional culture may provide opportunities for debate as well as consensus building (Dégh 2001; Firestone 1967), the articles in this volume highlight how people.s experiences of places and the narratives they construct of those places underline power dynamics. As McDowell argues,

it is socio-spatial practices that define places with multiple and changing boundaries, constructed and maintained through social relations of power and exclusion. Places are made through power relations which construct the rules which define the boundaries. These boundaries are both social and spatial . they define who belongs to a place and who may be excluded, as well as the location or site of the experience (McDowell 1999: 3-4).

While many of the articles in this collection document the construction of master narratives (Latta, Devlin Trew, Ivakhiv, Saillant, Richardson and Paumier, and Tye), they also document resistances to dominant discourses. Folklore has long been recognized as an expression of contestation or resistance (Scott 1985; Radner 1993), and the articles in this volume clearly show how places are interpreted and reinterpreted fluidly in ways that link not only to people's pasts but to their present and their future. Importantly, all the accounts of contested geographies here hold implications for the future. They envision change on both individual and societal levels for the ways things are done and how those processes are understood. From reflection on changing family dynamics through death (Brodie) or migration (Alburo), to explorations of alternate political visions (Devlin Trew, Saillant, Richardson and Paumier, Stan) and examination of women in public spaces (Tye), these articles examine aspects of traditional culture as expressions of contestation, and sometimes negotiation. In so doing, they offer hopeful glimpses of fairer ways of organizing our lives and our world.

References

Dégh, Linda. 2001. Legend and Belief: Dialectics of a Folklore Genre. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Firestone, Melvin. 1967.
Brothers and Rivals: Patrilocality in Savage Cove. St. John.s: Institute for Social and Economic Research.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. "Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight." In Clifford Geertz, ed.,
The Interpretation of Cultures: 412-453. New York: Basic Books.
________.1973.
The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
McDowell, Linda. 1999.
Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Miller, Daniel. 1998. "Coca-Cola: A Black Sweet Drink from Trinidad." In Daniel Miller, ed.,
Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter: 169-188. Urbana: University of Chicago Press.
Radner, Joan Newlon, ed. 1993.
Feminist Messages: Coding in Women's Folk Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Scott, James C. 1985.
Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

 

 

Top of page

FSAC Home Page

 

Current Issue
Back Issues
Notes for Articles Contributors
Subscription Details
Journal's Home Page